Back to all insights

Inside the Minds of EU Evaluators: What They Really Look for in Winning Proposals

Inside the Minds of EU Evaluators: What They Really Look for in Winning Proposals

You’ve read the guidebooks. You’ve studied past calls. You’ve built a brilliant project and followed all the formatting rules. But one question still looms: “What are EU evaluators really looking for?”

At FundMatchMaker.eu, we’ve supported dozens of companies through the EU funding process, working closely with consultants who know how evaluators think — and some who have been evaluators themselves. This article goes beyond the standard checklists to give you a deeper look into the mindset, expectations, and silent deal-breakers that shape EU grant decisions.

Whether you’re applying to Horizon Europe, the EIC Accelerator, or LIFE, understanding how reviewers interpret your proposal can mean the difference between success and rejection.

 

The Structure Behind the Judgement

Let’s start with the basics: EU proposals are scored against three core evaluation criteria:

  1. Excellence – Is the innovation technically sound, novel, and scientifically credible?

  2. Impact – Will it generate meaningful economic, social, or environmental value?

  3. Implementation – Is the plan clear, realistic, and backed by a capable team and work plan?

Each criterion is scored from 0 to 5:

  • 5 = Excellent

  • 4 = Very good

  • 3 = Good

  • 2 = Fair

  • 1 = Poor

  • 0 = Fail

Most proposals need to exceed a minimum score on each individual criterion and also reach a cumulative threshold to be considered for funding. These scores are not given arbitrarily — evaluators follow a strict rubric. But interpretation within those rules varies.

That’s where psychology, clarity, and structure play a crucial role.

 

Evaluators Are Human: Make Their Job Easy

An EU evaluator typically reads dozens of proposals in a short timeframe. Some are scientists. Others come from industry or policy. All are working under pressure to be fair, objective, and efficient.

What does this mean for you?

  • Clarity matters more than complexity. Don’t try to impress with jargon or page-long sentences.

  • Structure is key. If evaluators struggle to find the information they’re scoring, they will mark you down.

  • Assume they don’t know your niche. Even if they have a general background, never assume shared technical knowledge.

Tip: Use clear headings, diagrams, and bullets to guide the reader. Make the key messages obvious at first glance.

 

What Makes a Proposal “Excellent” in Their Eyes

1. Excellence: Not Just Innovation, But Differentiation

Evaluators don’t just want to know that your technology works. They want to understand:

  • What problem does it solve?

  • How is it better or different than existing solutions?

  • Is there credible evidence that the approach is feasible?

  • Are your TRL claims justified?

Avoid vague claims like “world-leading” or “game-changing” without backing them up. Provide:

  • Technical specs

  • Proof of concept

  • Validation studies

  • Competitor comparisons

Evaluator mindset: “If I fund this, will it push the frontier forward in a measurable, reliable way?”

2. Impact: Be Bold, But Believable

This is often where good projects lose their edge. Why?

  • They focus too much on features, not outcomes

  • They make big promises without proof

  • They fail to connect the dots between the innovation and real-world change

A strong Impact section includes:

  • Quantified KPIs (e.g. CO2 saved, lives impacted, jobs created)

  • Pathways to market (who will buy this, how, and when?)

  • Barriers to adoption and how you’ll overcome them

  • Alignment with EU priorities (e.g. Green Deal, Digital Europe, Health Union)

Evaluator mindset: “Is this worth the taxpayer’s money? Will it deliver tangible, Europe-wide benefits?”

3. Implementation: Show You Can Deliver

A great idea is only fundable if you can execute it. Evaluators look at:

  • Team experience and roles

  • Work package breakdowns

  • Risk analysis and mitigation strategies

  • Budget realism and justification

Your Gantt chart, partner roles, and deliverables must align. Avoid vague task descriptions like “develop technology” or “disseminate results.” Be specific.

Evaluator mindset: “Can this team do what they promise, on time and within budget?”

 

Hidden Red Flags Evaluators Won’t Ignore

Even strong projects can fail if they show signs of:

  • Overly optimistic timelines (e.g. launching a product in 6 months with a TRL 5 prototype)

  • Unclear ownership of IP or roles (especially in consortia)

  • Disconnection between parts (e.g. great tech with no business case, or vice versa)

  • Boilerplate writing that sounds generic or copy-pasted

Remember: reviewers are not just looking for strengths — they’re scanning for risks.

  

The Psychology of Scoring: How Evaluators Think Under Pressure

EU evaluators are expected to remain objective. But in reality, the quality of your writing and presentation deeply affects how your project is perceived. Studies show that:

  • First impressions shape scoring (especially in the Excellence section)

  • Evaluators often use the first few paragraphs to form an internal benchmark

  • The more confident and structured your tone, the more trustworthy you appear

This doesn’t mean you need to oversell. It means you need to present a coherent, well-packaged narrative that builds trust.

Tip: Avoid emotional language. Stay factual, focused, and mission-driven.


What Happens in Consensus Meetings

After the initial scoring, evaluators convene to reach consensus. During this phase:

  • Scores are compared and adjusted

  • Major disagreements are resolved

  • A unified Evaluation Summary Report (ESR) is created

This report forms the basis of your feedback. Strong comments from one evaluator can elevate your proposal. But weaknesses highlighted by multiple reviewers are likely to stick.

Strategy: Anticipate and pre-empt criticism. If your tech is high-risk, explain why the risk is worth it. If your budget is large, justify every euro.

 

How FundMatchMaker.eu Helps You Align With Evaluators

The consultants we match you with don’t just write — they translate your project into the language of evaluators. Many have served as reviewers themselves. They know:

  • How to structure content for each criterion

  • What gets flagged in scoring sheets

  • How to avoid fatal assumptions or omissions

When we match you with a consultant, they don’t just help you submit. They help you position. They act as your internal evaluator before the real one reads a single word.

 

Final Thoughts: Don’t Just Apply 

EU grants are highly competitive. But the winners aren’t always the most advanced projects. They’re the best presented, justified, and aligned projects.

By stepping into the shoes of an evaluator, you move from hopeful applicant to strategic contender. You begin to see your project not just as a creator — but as a fundable, scalable solution to a problem Europe wants to solve.

If you’re ready to move beyond guessing and build an application that speaks their language from page one, we’re here to help.

Want expert feedback before you submit?

more insights